Alarm prioritisation
Groups correlated events and presents asset, criticality, history and procedures for operator review.
Event correlation, asset graphs and anomaly detectionAI can relate condition, history, documentation and availability to prepare maintenance and field work without making safety-critical decisions.
Energy and facilities operations combine telemetry, inspections, alarms, work orders, spares and service obligations. An analytical layer can separate noise from relevant signals and assemble the record needed by planners and field staff.
On critical assets, a recommendation must never bypass protections, permits or procedures. The system can suggest priority and documentary steps; isolation, energisation, switching, fitness for service and safe work remain with authorised personnel.
Each application should be validated against the process, available data and the organisation's actual risk.
Groups correlated events and presents asset, criticality, history and procedures for operator review.
Event correlation, asset graphs and anomaly detectionCompletes drafts with documents, competencies, spares, permits and applicable risks without authorising work.
RAG, asset rules and CMMS automationIdentifies trends in vibration, temperature, performance or consumption and suggests prioritised inspections.
Time series, condition models and edge analyticsLets engineers consult current instructions and record findings by voice or image against the asset.
Multimodal AI, speech recognition and contextual searchChecks measurements, evidence, parts and technical closure, returning omissions to the responsible person.
Document AI, vision and completeness rulesCompares usage with load, weather and calendar to flag deviations that warrant investigation.
Energy normalisation, forecasting and change detectionAutomation prepares the work while clearly separating recommendation, permit and execution.
Ingest telemetry, alarms, rounds and reports with the asset hierarchy.
Include criticality, history, procedures, spares and service commitments.
Suggest priority and a draft intervention with explicit assumptions.
Competent staff verify risks, permits and status before intervention and closure.
The architecture adapts to each provider's APIs, permissions and limits. These are common tools and categories that would need validation.
A pilot could cover one non-critical asset class in one area over two maintenance cycles. CMMS and telemetry would be connected read-only, draft priorities and work orders generated, and planners and engineers would record corrections before any extension is assessed.
A sensible starting point is repetitive, verifiable work such as alarm prioritisation, work-order preparation, condition-based maintenance. Scope depends on available data, current tools and required controls.
Not necessarily. A pilot can connect to systems such as EAM or CMMS, SCADA or BMS, GIS, ERP and stores and initially be limited to reading, preparing or proposing actions before automatic writes are allowed.
The solution does not control equipment, override protections or execute switching, isolation or energisation. Work permits, lockout, risk assessment and asset fitness require authorised responsible staff. Recommendations display the data used, signal quality, uncertainty and current procedure.
A pilot could cover one non-critical asset class in one area over two maintenance cycles. CMMS and telemetry would be connected read-only, draft priorities and work orders generated, and planners and engineers would record corrections before any extension is assessed.