Vacancy intake
Turns a request into requirements, questions and approvals, flagging ambiguous or potentially exclusionary criteria.
Structured extraction, rules and inclusive templatesSupport tools can organise applications, interviews and communications under documented criteria and human review.
Recruitment teams coordinate vacancies, consent, CVs, interviews and assessments across many participants. Automation can organise that flow and reduce waiting without assigning opaque scores to an individual.
AI can summarise information relevant to explicit requirements, draft communications and check process consistency. Hiring, rejection, promotion, compensation and every employment decision remain with authorised professionals.
Each application should be validated against the process, available data and the organisation's actual risk.
Turns a request into requirements, questions and approvals, flagging ambiguous or potentially exclusionary criteria.
Structured extraction, rules and inclusive templatesExtracts stated experience against explicit requirements without inferring sensitive traits or deciding progression.
Document analysis with data minimisationProposes behavioural questions and a shared rubric linked to approved competencies.
Template-based generation and competency catalogueSummarises consented notes, separates observations from interpretations and returns the draft to the interviewer.
Optional transcription, extraction and approvalFinds slots, sends reminders and handles changes across time zones and preferences.
Calendar and messaging automationShows elapsed time, skipped steps and inconsistent rubric use for HR review.
Process analytics and fairness controlsThe system organises evidence; trained people assess context and make decisions.
Validate requirements, criteria, owners and the basis for processing personal data.
Centralise applications, diaries and communications with visible status.
Prepare summaries and rubrics that expose sources, omissions and corrections.
A panel or owner reviews the evidence and records the decision and rationale.
The architecture adapts to each provider's APIs, permissions and limits. These are common tools and categories that would need validation.
A safe pilot could cover coordination and interview-guide preparation for one job family. Across three processes, the team records elapsed time, diary changes, note corrections and rubric completion; the system neither ranks candidates nor recommends hiring or rejection.
A sensible starting point is repetitive, verifiable work such as vacancy intake, application organisation, interview guides. Scope depends on available data, current tools and required controls.
Not necessarily. A pilot can connect to systems such as Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Greenhouse, Personio and initially be limited to reading, preparing or proposing actions before automatic writes are allowed.
No inference of age, health, ethnicity, gender, emotion or other sensitive attributes. Regular bias testing, least-privilege access and defined retention and deletion periods. Hiring and employment decisions are exclusively human, with a route for review and correction.
A safe pilot could cover coordination and interview-guide preparation for one job family. Across three processes, the team records elapsed time, diary changes, note corrections and rubric completion; the system neither ranks candidates nor recommends hiring or rejection.