Document inbox
Identifies entity, period and evidence type, detects duplicates and requests missing fields.
OCR, table extraction and duplicate detectionWorkflows that can prepare data, detect inconsistencies and prioritise review without replacing accounting or tax judgement.
Advisory firms receive invoices, statements, payroll records and evidence in many formats and at uneven times. Automation can normalise that intake, propose postings and show what is missing before the team begins a close.
The useful distinction is between routine transactions and exceptions, with evidence retained for every value. Tax classification, submissions and interpretative positions remain subject to professional validation and client authorisation.
Each application should be validated against the process, available data and the organisation's actual risk.
Identifies entity, period and evidence type, detects duplicates and requests missing fields.
OCR, table extraction and duplicate detectionProposes accounts, tax codes and cost centres under firm rules for technician confirmation.
Supervised classification and rules engineSuggests links between bank entries, invoices and ledger records, isolating differences for investigation.
Record linkage, tolerance rules and confidence scoringSummarises received, outstanding and rejected evidence by client and obligation.
Process orchestration and operational dashboardsSearches current internal guidance and procedures, returning the source and last update date.
RAG with temporal metadata and access controlPrioritises unusual values, suppliers or patterns for checking without labelling them as fraud.
Statistical anomaly detection and explanationsEvery automation retains the evidence and routes exceptions to the team.
Receive files and validate entity, period, legibility and duplication.
Extract fields into a common schema and apply client-configured rules.
Propose matches and separate items without sufficient evidence.
Review proposals and record who authorises the posting, close or submission.
The architecture adapts to each provider's APIs, permissions and limits. These are common tools and categories that would need validation.
A pilot could cover purchase invoices for a small client group during a closed period. Extraction and proposals would be compared with the normal process, recording corrections, duplicates and preparation time; nothing would be posted or filed without approval from the assigned technician.
A sensible starting point is repetitive, verifiable work such as document inbox, posting preparation, assisted reconciliation. Scope depends on available data, current tools and required controls.
Not necessarily. A pilot can connect to systems such as A3, Sage, Holded, Microsoft 365 and initially be limited to reading, preparing or proposing actions before automatic writes are allowed.
Strict client data separation and role-based permissions. Confidence thresholds that route doubtful fields to review rather than filling gaps. Human approval for postings, returns, payroll and tax positions.
A pilot could cover purchase invoices for a small client group during a closed period. Extraction and proposals would be compared with the normal process, recording corrections, duplicates and preparation time; nothing would be posted or filed without approval from the assigned technician.